Stairmaster of Disaster

Stairmaster of Disaster

La Bombe Philosophique

Wedding Bomb Collage

Window display of bridal fashion store
with war figurines advancing on wedding dress in battle formation (multiple views)
Valencia, Spain
July 2007

Albert Einstein’s hypothesis of three imminent bombs—nuclear, information, population—is a motif that has woven its way insistently into Paul Virilio’s analysis of contemporary society and his war model of urban change. It is an astute conceptual choice for Virilio since it was in the twentieth century that the implications of light speed and the theory of relativity continually unfolded to reshape social relations from the local community level to that of global geopolitics, punctuated most resoundingly by the twin detonations of Little Boy and Fat Man in 1945, and those of the Twin Towers in 2001.

That said, the seductiveness of the bomb as motif proves problematic at times since Virilio himself weaves between the traditional understanding of a weapon and his true interest, which is the idea of bomb as metaphor for the accident that is located within the substance of any technology. Semantically fusing the weapon with the accident obscures those aspects of intent and agency required to instrumentalize properties of the latter for creating and detonating a bomb of the former type.

The relationship between war machines and accidents is complicated as the question of property enters the discussion, for in the post-Fordist regime we find that all types of information have been rendered to the property form. Here is the point at which Virilio's genetic bomb begins to develop—not because of the expressly militaristic imperative as before with the Manhattan Project and ARPAnet, but because of the profit potential that exists in owning the language of living things and creating flesh products based on that knowledge. This should not be understood as a recourse to dialectical materialism but rather as an exploration of how the trialectic relationship between weapon, accident and property form may suggest new lines of inquiry to the questions that Virilio poses.

Wedding Bomb

Window display of bridal fashion store (detail)
Valencia, Spain
July 2007

Little Boy to Fat Man might also be understood as the consumption trajectory of Western sport masculinity, from the promising young athlete to the just past prime spectator of television. In this trajectory the dynamics of the libidinal yield to the stasis of the lipidinal as the nervous system accelerates faster than what is capable by mere flesh and bone. Dromology, of course, has its root in the Greek word dromos, for race or running, that most fundamental of sporting cultures. And whether we are discussing the Olympian sort with its citius, altius, fortius (…copiosus) or the commodified professional sort of capitalist accumulation, sporting cultures are at their core grounded in moving bodies which have been subject throughout their history to forces of acceleration. They might thus play a role in helping us understand a logic and politics of speed, how speed is created, how it is administered, and the accident that lies within.

Perhaps none of Virilio's many contributions to critical thought are so visceral as the detonation of this philosophical bomb of bombs. As such, they beg a visceral response. With that in mind, consider the following an attempt to catalogue an archaeology of the stereoscopic present—a present in which we simultaneously exist in the corporeality of the everyday with its sensuality, affect and duration, as well as the global real-time of the network in which light speed has telescoped all past and future into a persistent now. And if the notion of a catalogue seems far too linear for the age of networked optoelectronics, then instead consider the following a form of speed writing to match that accelerating shockwave which Virilio has exploded all around us.

Introduction to the forthcoming essay:
"La Bombe Philosophique: An Archaeology of the Stereoscopic Present (Or, Sporting Through the Shrapnel)"

absence, presence, enclosure

When a stadium is replicated from its material state to that of the immaterial digital game environment an interesting change occurs. Those structural elements of the stadium that are necessary to the overall architectural form, both public (bathrooms, concourses) and private (storage rooms, HVAC systems), are eliminated from the ludic experience of the digital space. However, the physics that each of these elements provides to the holism of its engineering are still respected as far as the perspective of the gamer is concerned, though they are represented in scalable vector and polygonal mathematics rather than as physical load-bearing conduits for produced force. The floor does not sink towards a particular corner, nor do cracks appear in the ceiling. Though the degrees of freedom for the user have been substantially constrained, in other words, virtual sports spaces continue to function as if the entire stadium still existed.


Willis McGahee - Courtesy of

minutes after the fact, with only the lurching treadmarks of the motorized medical cart left to scar the otherwise rectilinear striations of the gridiron pitch, one remains amazed at how the spectacle industry has developed protocol for neurological devastation to the collective football flesh

The Knot

The urban gait surfer locates traces of itself throughout the archives of the city and the annals of its moving bodies. This city is understood as a history of structures and flows, each interplaying with the other, constraining the possibilities of the other, and creating the other anew. But these are by definition only partial traces, gratuitous appropriations from an ever-changing trajectory of nomadism (the flâneur, the psychogeographer, the surfer, the street skater, the parkour athlete) to situate a particular social, cultural and political moment, as the twisted plaits of a braid form a beautiful (and communicative) knot in a macramé pattern before separating to become elsewhere and when.

The Acceleration of Duration

In The Spirit of Terrorism, Baudrillard wonders, following 9/11, what architectural form is worthy of being annihilated today? In considering the question we must first acknowledge that any potentially targeted architectural object must carve out a unique form in both space and time. That a building should be distinctive enough in its spatial form and purpose is obvious, but an element of duration is also required for that object to have accumulated the requisite symbolic capital necessary to achieve a critical semiotic yield. This is what makes the case of the World Trade Center particularly interesting: in only three decades, the twin towers were able to absorb all of the symbolism of an American capitalism that had rapidly become multinational, with ambitions of radiating globally. Put differently, the light-speed of Hollywood and the spectacle-making industry had accelerated the process of forging duration.

From the forthcoming essay:
"La Bombe Philosophique: An Archaeology of the Stereoscopic Present (Or, Sorting Through the Shrapnel)"