Prekaryat (Ltd Inc.)

ok polis

for n = i
i n, i m
mi i = y
i = 5 y?
get $ for i = y
$i max max
mi max $stack $tax

echo {echo {echo {{echo
hi hi $i $i
mi y x
d(x) x hex hex
i>y>x

echo "to whom it may;"
echo "concern please consider;"
echo "this;"

this

echo "this letter of reference;"
echo "this letter of reference;"
echo "this letter of reference;"

referents and deference and
elevated reverence

and
manyfactored relevance

field facing form filling
font fetching face frilling
fast fasting feed faking
fee faring free fading

(refresh #ffffff)

echo "sir sir miss miss;"
echo "please consider this;"

for $i

echo "respectfully;"
echo "sincerely;"
or
echo "yours truly;"

if i = truly
then get $i
else die

for ($i = 1, $i <= 10; $i++);
echo {echo {echo {{echo
get get y?

all in for contagion. (biogram/biopsy)

all in for contagion

on accelerating

iBolt (No.22)

on the surface it seems profoundly anti-"ecological" (to use a term floating around right now) to go wholesale into an acceleration: ecologies are more profoundly periods of stillness mixed with accelerations. the latter are very traumatic, especially when considered intensively — childbirth is an acceleration of sorts, in which the "speed" and "distance" involved don't seem like much, and yet are extremely traumatic in both material and psychic senses (and we could include the traumas of other accelerations, such as returning from space travel, car accidents, the fall of the Berlin Wall, etc. etc.).

what sort of ruptures, tears and detachments would be implied in an accelerationism at the planetary level?

before this technical infrastructure was "turned on", so to speak, i'd love to know more about the ontological, epistemological and ethical problems entailed — for example, collaborative decision-making which is shot through by speed and its intensified fragmentation of part-knowledges and part-subjects.

since it wouldn't be animals, rocks or other "objects" creating these technical infrastructures it seems fair to ask these questions even if they seem a little "humanist" in the process.

 

Speeedd

 

in the meantime, can we start more simply by "training" for an accelerationist world, not unlike how a world-class sprinter would do: by dialing up tempo and intensity incrementally, learning how to endure, speeding up and slowing down "schizostrategically" (to use joseph's term), allowing traumas (muscular, psychic, relational) to heal more readily, all while preparing for the "big race" — even if we don't know what or when said race is, or if it is for a people to come?

__________

(thoughts that have been gestating for a while, and which have only "accelerated" since reading nick srnicek and alex williams' #accelerate manifesto and mckenzie wark's response a few weeks ago.)

nonhuman actors and expression

Stadium Surfing

Idea for a Conceptual Art Project, No.22:

1. Take a sports stadium teeming with partisan fans.
2. Combine the pixelated card stunt with the spectator wave to create an 8-bit surfing avatar.
3. Ride that motherfucker 'round and 'round the stadium.
4. Synchronize wide-angle tracking shot.
5. Bail avatar headfirst into the wash.

 

A Short Note on Crowds and Expression

The "crowd" at a sporting event is not simply an aggregated number of individuals, nor a produced energy or volume, but a relationship to the capacity and architecture of a competition space proper (3,000 people watching a basketball game is a large number, for example, though one that loses significance in the context of an 18,000-seat sports arena). This relationship is precisely what constitutes the crowd as "crowd" — as an autonomous actor in its own right, singular yet plural, but also understood as an intensity. The plurality is this material aggregation in space of spectating bodies, while the "crowd"-as-singular is the singularity of a produced intensity as it waxes and wanes in the context of its architectural relation. That is, as an intensity the crowd may peak or subside but it may never be subdivided as such and still retain its internal coherency, as-crowd. Material space may be prefigured, but experiential space is co-generated.

Similarly, it is understood that there is some relationship between the energy of a crowd and the quality, sharpness and affective tone of the players on the court. This is not meant as a causal relationship of call-and-response between the two parties, but is rather to suggest mutual feedback loops between the "positive" or "negative" energies of a crowd, on the one hand, and the relative qualities of discipline and stylishness performed by the athletes at play, on the other. It is a mutually emerging field of experience we are describing, affective tensors played out in loosely-configured strategies of produced tension. A collective sporting individuation.

Have you ever tried playing an "important" game in an empty gym?

As we've already suggested, however, the crowd is also produced as an individuation in its relation to the arena architecture. If this is indeed the case then we must further note that the arena architecture plays a role in producing the gestural expression of the athletes at play. In other words, the nonhuman machine of the sporting arena — in a material sense — co-generates the expressive potential of those who perform.

Or, put differently again, this architectural object becomes subject-in-relation as its potential affects are to likewise produce an artificial becoming of athletic virtuosity. Those qualities of discipline and stylishness performed by the athletes at play may best reach their expressive peaks precisely because of their relationship to the material form of the sporting space proper.

(The question then becomes one of Virilian traject, or the tempo at which this arcing clinamen of individuating process plays itself out expressively, in contagio.)

natality: scrabble (letter to: a young ingrid, (i'm)pulsion)

klein-impulsion

attn:

natality?

yin yan
tail tail
tiny lan lit

a y/n ail.

i alt ny
tan anal it
natty
taint, tit
nail tna nitty

aint any latin
lint anti italy

 

~
NO. NOT IT. STOP. PLI-NATAL, PLS.
~

 

impulsion?

i/o

i plus us
minus u (plus u)

ou

moi plus nous
moins il ou L (plus lui)

oui oui

sun sin loins (sí)
opium oil nip
spumoni plum sip
spin spin slip

slip
snip snip lips

(i'm)pulsion

 

~

 

i plus iii
minus Y
        minus pms-ism
                minus simstim ip pin
                        politY

 

pulmón-natal
. . sssss . . . .

iou

 

my soul alit
                                                in tailspin
not simply an

(i'll)usion

gift: scrabble (letter to: a young ingrid, less than three)

shiiine the lighght

[fig. i]

 

if i .gif
it fit i, ft
fifi tit gig ggg
ffft.

if i .tiff
fi tig g.i.
i fit figt                        (sorry saroyan gif)
i git.

 

~

 

if i fit it
i+i+i+…
iff i fit it
i gift it.

 

gigg(igg(igg))) )) ) :)

 

tgif,
<iii