Despite my earlier post stating that sport is a globalanguage (based on the proposition that the Latin citius, altius, fortius is understood by athletes from all corners of the world), sport is in fact not a globalanguage, but it is a medium for a true globalanguage: Logos.
A little over a century ago, ranchers would sear the flesh of their cattle as a means of identifying one herd from another. Each ranch had its own sign that represented its own particular brand mark; the sign came to have meaning for those in the community that reflected the mores and values of that particular ranch.
Over time, corporations began to use brand marks to represent the mores and values of the firm, marks that we now commonly refer to as corporate logos. Conglomerates such as Nike, McDonald's and IBM spend millions of dollars annually to reinforce the meaning of these logos. And in a move that would shock the cattle before us, we voluntarily brand ourselves with these image-signs, either on the extended skins of our clothing or, less (dis-?) figuratively in some cases, by tattoo.
The difference in our case, of course, is that our herd affiliation has much less permanence that that of our bovine counterparts. Simply by changing a t-shirt, an athlete may go from the Nike stable to that of rival adidas. We live as transientities in the world of Logos.
The logo, in its iconographic nature, is highly contextual. For example, if one were to see this:

one might consider the mutually beneficial relationship between Nike and Michael Jordan during the NBA's phoenician rise from the economic ashes.
On the other hand, if one saw the same logo in this context:

one might ponder the transformation of the Olympic Games from homage to the gods, through allegiance to nation-states, to corporate servitude, and Nike's role in recruiting the world's best labour force to that end — citius, altius, fortius, copiosus.
Finally, the same corporate logo in this context:

might recall complaints from the 1990s about Nike's sweatshop labour practices in Vietnam.
In short, brand marks have extended themselves at electric speed to form a language of their own — what I have termed Logos. In a retrieval of iconographic forms of communication such as the Egyptian hieroglyphics or the Sumerian cuneiforms, Logos is a highly-symbolic, highly-interpretive form of communication, unique in its global nature. The implosion of all meanings around the world down to the very level of the sign leaves the logo or brand mark trembling under its own energy.
What is dangerous in this scenario, however, is that we currently have very little control over the evolution of this globalanguage. Copyright and trademark law essentially prevent us, via the threat of (legal) force, from attaching any meaning of our own to a particular logo. This is radically different from the usual evolution of a language through common usage of words and phrases; what was once a public good has reversed into a medium of private ownership.
Artists have made their voices heard in response to the rise of Logos, through derivative artworks, such as "American Alphabet" by Heidi Cody, to more specific culture jamming exercises, such as "Consumer Whore" by Kieron Dwyer. Given that sport is a such a powerful medium to communicate via Logos, one can only speculate as to potential responses against the sportocratic apparatus.
Feedback: 0 comments | Permalink: url